User Enrollment: None Posted Notes:8
-HELPFUL:2
-NOT HELPFUL:1
-NEEDS MORE RATINGS:5 Posted Ratings:148
-HELPFUL:95
-SOMEWHAT HELPFUL:3
-NOT HELPFUL:50
Posted Notes
2024-05-21 15:07:21
It seems to be an undisclosed ad by the original poster. The first link was pushed here - [Link] This goes against explicit X (formerly known as Twitter) policies where ad has to be disclosed. See the link - [Link][Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL(4-0-0)
Related notes[1]
2024-11-05 06:34:18
It is copying another tweet that went viral recently without proper attribution in the hopes of going viral. This account is known for doing this. [Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL(15-1-0)
Related notes[1]
2024-12-13 05:22:51
This is engagement farming at its finest. This user has been known to do this previously. It is ripping off an existing tweet that sourced it from Reddit. [Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL(1-0-2) Related notes[2]
2024-07-20 17:37:57
This is a very old joke being used for engagement farming and click baiting. Engagement farming is forbidden on X (formerly known as twitter): [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(6-0-4) Related notes[2]
2024-07-23 17:01:41
Ashwini Vaishnaw belongs to the party that presented the budget and has an inherent bias. Another X post explains the math behind it and debunks Ashwini's post. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(21-2-7) Related notes[5]
2024-07-26 16:16:50
It seems to be an undisclosed ad by the original poster. This goes against explicit X (formerly known as Twitter) policies where ad has to be disclosed. See the link - [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(3-0-0)
Related notes[1]
2025-01-04 16:57:47
The underlying article states that Jagdeep Singh gets an annual salary of Rs 17,500 crores which translates to roughly 2 billion annually. Over a period of 2 years it is ~ $4bn The market cap of roughly $3bn therefore making this unlikely. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(10-0-1) Related notes[3]
2025-02-03 12:26:20
This is an undisclosed advertisement. A few similar ads have popped up with similar posts by larger accounts - [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(6-0-0)
Related notes[1]