User Enrollment: None Posted Notes:6
-HELPFUL:1
-NOT HELPFUL:0
-NEEDS MORE RATINGS:5 Posted Ratings:655
-HELPFUL:309
-SOMEWHAT HELPFUL:4
-NOT HELPFUL:342
Posted Notes
2023-05-11 18:28:55
The Pope was asked '...how do we love at the same time people who have experienced abuse and their abusers?' The Pope responded. '...Even talking to the abuser involves revulsion...they are God’s children too. They deserve punishment, but they also deserve pastoral care. [Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL(22-1-2)
Related notes[1]
2023-05-22 17:51:29
No note needed. This tweet is accurate. Rhetorical corrections are for the reply section. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-2-0)
Related notes[1]
2023-11-17 12:06:27
We must be aware of the effects of making needless CNs. They can de-monetize posts, which should be avoided unless the post misleading. This post is not, therefore NNN NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(7-0-3) Related notes[3]
2024-02-21 17:47:32
A Supreme Court Judge appointed by the Gov. (which is in favour of a 'yes' vote) to combat misinformation has stated that the Constitution does not say women's place is in the home. Therefore, it is not sexist. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(7-0-3) Related notes[5]
2024-07-23 10:41:23
Underage alleged victims are not a reliable source of information when they try to exculpate alleged abusers, it is often a form of quasi-stockholm syndrome. Also the note above uses the wrong pronouns for the alleged abuser, because he is a man. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(13-1-32)
Related notes[1]
2024-08-22 11:33:37
The shroud is subject to much open debate without CNs. The 2022 study should be allowed to be openly debated because it is still an open question. The study dating the shroud to the middle ages has been noted to have been a test on an edge sample with a different stitch style. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(13-2-10) Related notes[12]