User Enrollment: None Posted Notes:5
-HELPFUL:0
-NOT HELPFUL:1
-NEEDS MORE RATINGS:4 Posted Ratings:0
-HELPFUL:0
-SOMEWHAT HELPFUL:0
-NOT HELPFUL:0
Posted Notes
2024-11-04 23:45:15
Some CN writers claim NNN since the post does not support the video. However, the video is an integral part of the post and if it needs added context (which it does), it will be done through CN. [Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL(0-0-1) Related notes[8]
2024-10-23 14:36:35
Please link to unpaid sources for the CN to actually help everyone. Alternative: [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(9-1-3) Related notes[9]
2024-10-30 02:21:55
İçerikte bahsedilen deney kişisel zaman algısını işliyor. Anlatılan durum deneydeki kişinin zaman algısının subjektifliğiyle ilgili ve zamanın genel olarak illüzyon olduğuna dair herhangi bir sonuç vermiyor. Kişisel zaman algısının subjektifliği zaten bilinen bir durum. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-0-0) Related notes[2]
2024-10-30 14:57:51
To NNN note: This post is better with a CN. Many people in the comments are not sure whether the person in the video is the girl in the meme or not. CN works by making notes useful to the "broadest set of people possible" [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-0-4) Related notes[3]
2024-11-01 23:28:06
Not NNN. The original post was seen by more than 1,5M people atm. The "joke" explanation has 1/10 pf that impression. At least 9/10 of users need the context that this photo is taken from an older post. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(43-2-32) Related notes[7]