User:D3F7C01B1B192689B66F194C05CE4EA9913E4DE1C8ACCA1F0174BC585E57FBE9
User Enrollment: NonePosted Notes:2
-HELPFUL:0
-NOT HELPFUL:0
-NEEDS MORE RATINGS:2
Posted Ratings:0
-HELPFUL:0
-SOMEWHAT HELPFUL:0
-NOT HELPFUL:0
Posted Notes
2024-12-16 02:51:55
Those saying NNN miss the point that OP claims something as fact when Musk did not “admit” anything. This falls under CN “contains a factual error”. OP is using opinion as fact. One NNN says OP is trying to interpret “real meaning”, which is not factual to what Musk said. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-0-7)
Related notes[5]
Those saying NNN miss the point that OP claims something as fact when Musk did not “admit” anything. This falls under CN “contains a factual error”. OP is using opinion as fact. One NNN says OP is trying to interpret “real meaning”, which is not factual to what Musk said. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-0-7)
Related notes[5]
2024-12-16 07:56:22
Saying NNN is stupid. Sure, there’s a tiny little grok watermark… but just because a handful of people might catch it doesn’t mean a note isn’t warranted. To say this is “obviously” AI (as another note mentioned) is subjective and people might still fall for it. Do better. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-0-2)
Related notes[3]
Saying NNN is stupid. Sure, there’s a tiny little grok watermark… but just because a handful of people might catch it doesn’t mean a note isn’t warranted. To say this is “obviously” AI (as another note mentioned) is subjective and people might still fall for it. Do better. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-0-2)
Related notes[3]
Rated Notes
