User:E76BB444E889E43CD9A3C2EF1BFC9A2DBE9ACC463730C22339976825A5EFEDCF
User Enrollment: NonePosted Notes:2
-HELPFUL:2
-NOT HELPFUL:0
-NEEDS MORE RATINGS:0
Posted Ratings:0
-HELPFUL:0
-SOMEWHAT HELPFUL:0
-NOT HELPFUL:0
Posted Notes
2023-10-13 01:49:54
Schneider v. Rusk, the case Cenk cites, requires that all citizens be treated equally under the law. However, the majority made one exception: "The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the 'natural born' citizen is eligible to be President" Source: [Link]
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL(20-1-1)
Related notes[4]
Schneider v. Rusk, the case Cenk cites, requires that all citizens be treated equally under the law. However, the majority made one exception: "The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the 'natural born' citizen is eligible to be President" Source: [Link]
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL(20-1-1)
Related notes[4]
2023-10-13 01:50:45
Schneider v. Rusk, the case Cenk cites, requires that all citizens be treated equally under the law. However, the majority made one exception: "The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the 'natural born' citizen is eligible to be President" Source: [Link]
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL(3-0-0)
Related notes[1]
Schneider v. Rusk, the case Cenk cites, requires that all citizens be treated equally under the law. However, the majority made one exception: "The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the 'natural born' citizen is eligible to be President" Source: [Link]
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL(3-0-0)
Related notes[1]
Rated Notes
