2023-06-29 20:23:29
US law is not settled and is subject to change by a state courts or the Supreme Court (SC). The SC is meant to deal with laws that pertain to the constitution. The constitution is the only set of laws that can’t be changed. Race discrimination is against the 14th amendment. [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(31-0-4) Author
2023-06-29 21:04:52
There are many instances of "settled law" that were rightfully overturned. Here are two examples: [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(17-2-6) Author
2023-06-29 21:50:07
Asserting that the ruling "narrowed educational opportunity for all," misses the point that those who were discriminated against, namely Asian and white applicants, will now have more opportunity. The ruling makes discrimination by race unlawful, which isn't extremist at all. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(19-2-9) Author
2023-06-29 21:55:10
In Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) which upheld affirmative action 5-4, Justice O'Connor wrote in the majority opinion of the court: "We expect that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest that we approve today." [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(32-3-2) Author
2023-06-30 03:26:45
It’s a paradox to believe in both Title 9 and affirmative action at the same time. Discrimination by race is discrimination, even if that discrimination benefits one group over another. Affirmative action is by definition racist and this decision is a huge win for racial equality NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(9-1-10) Author