2023-12-10 09:09:34
The UN has no right or ability to impose a ceasefire on a combatant like Hamas. [Link] There was a ceasefire in November which Hamas broke by refusing to hand over hostages including women & the elderly, and refusing to allow them to be seen by the Red Cross. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(7-0-14) Author
2023-12-10 09:41:53
NNN. While there would have been no effective ceasefire, it is factually correct that the only country vetoing it is the US. Pinning the blame on Hamas as the suggested note does is disingenuine, if only for the fact that Israel historically ignores most if not all resolutions [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(6-1-2) Author
2023-12-11 17:50:06
NNN. Please write a more neutral note. CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL(1-0-3) Author
2023-12-11 18:04:18
Even if the UN security council had voted to call for a ceasefire, there is no guarantee that their call would have been headed by either side and that there would actually be a lasting ceasefire, especially Hamas who are not a member state of the UN. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-0-1) Author
2023-12-12 00:08:46
The UN has no authority to enforce resolutions. A UN resolution calling for a ceasefire would likely have no direct impact on combat operations. [Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL(36-4-15) Author
2023-12-12 13:10:39
Important context: This user 15 years old [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-6) Author
2023-12-12 18:16:40
The UN Security Council can enforce a ceasefire using collective military action and UN peacekeepers. It has done so in the past. The current note is factually and legally wrong. [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(3-0-1) Author
2023-12-13 17:52:02
NNN Tweet is factually correct in that we could have had a ceasefire, tweet does not say or imply that a ceasefire would have been a definite outcome if the resolution hadn't been vetoed NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-0-1) Author