2024-07-01 22:00:29
This is a mischaracterization of the SCOTUS ruling. SCOTUS found that "The President... may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers"; however, the President has "no immunity for his unofficial acts... The President is not above the law". See pg 50: [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(32-0-8) Author
2024-07-01 23:38:23
NNN This is clearly a personal opinion. If you disagree with it then use the comments to address NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(7-0-11) Author
2024-07-02 00:56:34
What he is saying in the post is extremism, not how the court ruled or what the docket states. The POTUS has immunity from a Presidential act. To state otherwise is inciteful and misleading. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(13-0-6) Author
2024-07-04 20:00:32
Someone seems to be saying that this is a personal opinion. However, it is misleading as it is clearly not what SCOTUS ruled. The information is publicly available, including to Mr. Reiner, so a note is in fact needed. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-2) Author