2025-01-01 17:42:57
There were no fixed barriers in place as they were being replaced. This post is referring to the old bollards that have been removed in order to be replaced. Source: [Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL(18-1-14) Author
2025-01-01 22:51:55
NNN- OP is correct, the government failed in its primary duty. If the bollards were necessary to replace (at great expense to the taxpayers I'm sure) there should have been a temporary, sturdy protective barrier in place. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(7-0-0) Author
2025-01-02 03:34:20
NN, Whether the gov should have installed a temporary barrier is absolutely irrelevant. The claim is that the barriers were not raised, and the proposed note explaining why they couldn’t be is important added context, that will help readers understand why it was not raised. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-2) Author