User Enrollment: None Posted Notes:10
-HELPFUL:0
-NOT HELPFUL:0
-NEEDS MORE RATINGS:10 Posted Ratings:0
-HELPFUL:0
-SOMEWHAT HELPFUL:0
-NOT HELPFUL:0
Posted Notes
2023-10-09 12:15:46
The funds were only to be available for humanitarian purchases, but money is fungible. Allowing $6B for acceptable spending frees up other money for whatever they want. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-0-1) Related notes[2]
2023-10-14 02:50:52
While one might imply these are names from the recent attacks, it doesn't explicitly say it. It could just be highlighting the history of attacks on Jewish children. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-1-5) Related notes[5]
2023-11-13 23:32:01
The OP correctly claims that civilians etc can't be deliberately targeted, but also suggests they must be protected at all times. This is not the case. Civilian casualties may be a consequence of a legitimate military strike. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(18-0-17) Related notes[6]
2023-12-16 22:45:36
The post claims "There was never an Israel..." There wasn't a modern state of Israel, as it exists today, but there was a Kingdom of Israel as demonstrated in many of the notes and comments. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(8-0-6) Related notes[9]
2024-01-16 23:54:28
As much as I dislike Adam Schiff (and I do dislike him) the post is his opinion, which he is entitled to share. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-1-2) Related notes[5]
2024-01-19 22:45:53
Both David and the reposter are expressing their opinions. NNN NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-0-1) Related notes[4]
2024-02-25 21:17:01
No legislation is proposed or currently under consideration that would remove the rights of any New Zealander. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-0)
Related notes[1]
2024-03-20 11:01:23
No recent poling shows anything like the results claimed. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-0)
Related notes[1]
2024-09-16 01:16:58
It's not even expressing an opinion. It's just asking a question. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(5-0-2) Related notes[5]
2025-01-24 11:14:10
The CN from Spectacular Aspen Thicketbird assumes the courts of SA will fairly decide compensation. However, if they decide it is fair to seize the land with no compensation, they can. The link provided confirms this. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-1) Related notes[3]